“And whosoever shall cause one of these little ones that believe on me to stumble, it were better for him if a great millstone were hanged about his neck, and he were cast into the sea.” Mark 9:24
Autism was unknown before 1943, but in 1980 1 in 10,000 children were autistic, and now it is 1 in 50i. 17% are now developmentally disabled and 43% have chronic disease and disorders. There must be a reason, and if you wish to protect your children, please read on.
What a tragedy to birth a child or rescue a child from abortion, to later be condemned to a sub-human existence due to such maladies.
If you are like me, you personally know of children who have suffered severe reactions and/or become autistic or brain damaged after receiving vaccines. Common sense and a few simple questions make the connection obvious. Autism was unknown among the Amish before they began vaccinating their children. But conventional medicine says that “the cause of autism is unknown”. They pretend the law of cause and effect is null and void when huge liabilities are at stake? For example, 14 babies in Argentina died after participating in a vaccine trial, and they deny that the vaccine had anything to do with the deaths. Close to 100 deaths have been reported after Guardasil vaccinations, and they deny a causal relationship.
What could be worse than the tragedy of autism? Is not also any brain impairment a tragedy, such as reduced IQ, dyslexia, learning disabilities, hyperactivity, etc. Why take a chance on such tragic results. So you need to do your own research and make your own decisions.
For example with the flu vaccine, children 6 months to 3 years receive half, and 3 years and up receive the full adult dose. This way, a 3-year old child will receive the same as a 300 pound man. Since vaccines are highly toxic, this is insane.
It is analogous to putting a 25 pound weight on the back of children 6 months to 3 years, and a 50 pound weight on those three years and above. And then those that are crushed by the weight, well it certainly had nothing to do with the weight, but rather the crushed person had some genetic weakness or some other defect or weakness which caused him to be crushed. That is the kind of reasoning being used in denying that it is vaccines which are causing autism, other brain damage, and death. Here is a glaring example of this kind of logic.
Vaccines can be life-saving, for example rabies and tetanus, but the 40-plus doses now recommended by the CDC are most certainly excessive, and if they were to cause brain damage or autism in your child, then virtually any of the diseases would have been better.
As we said, 1 in 50 children are now autistic. But the odds are much worse if you include less-drastic brain damage such as learning and emotional disabilities, mental retardation, hyperactivity, visual and hearing problems, etc., depending on the severity and part of the brain damaged. The graph shows the increase in autism with increase in vaccinations.
Mercury is extremely toxic (more than lead, and furthermore lead enhances mercury toxicity), especially to the nerves and brain. The EPA says 0.1µg of mercury per Kg of body weight is the maximum safe amount per day. A 5 percentile 6-month-old boy weighs 6.5 kg and for him a .25ml multi-dose Fluzone shot contains 12.5µg of mercury. Dose is not adjusted for body weight, so doing the math, such child will receive 12.5µg/6.5kg = 1.92µg per Kg of body weight. That is 19.2 times the safe amount can be injected into the delicate body and brain of a 6 month-old, and it would be worse for a more underweight baby. What rational person can say this is not dangerous? And what about multiple shots and cumulative effects over 40-plus shots. And, the EPA limit might be high to begin with for a child.
By contrast, the FDA is concerned that “… some fish and shellfish contain higher levels of mercury that may harm an unborn baby or young child’s developing nervous system.” About 1 part per million would be an unusually high amount of mercury in a fish. So, if the above 6-month old were to eat 100 grams of such fish (a huge meal for him) which contains .1µg of mercury, he would ingest 1/125th of the mercury in the shot. So, why is the FDA concerned about the mercury in the fish, but 125 times that amount in the form of a shot (or more from multiple shots) is “perfectly safe”? Furthermore, only a fraction of the mercury would be absorbed from the fish, but 100% of the mercury in the shot is absorbed. There is just no comparison and this is insane.
Mercury is now much reduced in most vaccines, but whatever is used to replace it (aluminum compounds, MSG, polysorbate-80, etc.) must have roughly the same toxicity in order to insure that multi-dose vials don’t get infected. That autism continues to increase is evidence of this toxicity. Single-dose vials need much less antiseptic and so are much safer.
About the time of the reduction of mercury in many vaccines (but not all), a new threat has appeared, namely the use of aborted fetal tissue to produce many vaccines. We all know that if tissue or an organ from one person is transplanted to another person, the immune system of the recipient will attack and destroy the foreign tissue. Some researchers believe that the human DNA now in vaccines can cause auto-immune responses in the recipients and could well be a new cause of autism. This is also an affront to pro-lifers, and makes those who accept such vaccines accomplices to abortion.
All systems have limits and the immune system is no exception. Adjuvants are added to provoke a stronger immune response, but this will deplete the immune system, leaving it weaker to defend against other threats. Some home-schooling parents told me they gave all the recommended vaccinations to their first children, but then saw that it caused runny noses, sore throats, earaches, etc. So, they did not vaccinate subsequent children, and these children stayed completely healthy. Some adjuvants are also implicated in autoimmune diseases such as lupus.
Speaking in common-sense terms, if you are in a war and expecting an attack from a certain direction, and you concentrate your defenses in that direction, then you obviously become more vulnerable in the other directions. This is exactly what vaccines do, make you more vulnerable to other diseases, and in many cases do not increase your protection from the disease(s) vaccinated against, such as the flu shot.
I am not a doctor, and so cannot give medical advice, but if I had a baby I would:
1) Practice genuinely good nutrition1. This is critical as an abundance of vitamins, minerals and anti-oxidants is what will give the body the resourceses necessary to defend against toxins. In fact I strongly expect that this is a major factor in why one child is harmed by a vaccine and another is apparently un-harmed by the same vaccine. In fact, there is now emerging evidence that vitamin D deficiency makes a child more suseptible to Autism.
2) Get a Texas Exemption so I could accept only vaccinations proven over time,
3) Always insist on single-dose vials,
4) Never permit more than one shot per visit to the doctor,
5) Wait at least a month between vaccinations,
6) Never accept a vaccination when the child is sick as his resistance would be low,
7) Give vitamin C just before the vaccination to protect against the toxins,2
8) Be extra careful the younger the child, as the more delicate and susceptible his system will be,
9) Be extra careful with a low-weight child, as the concentration of toxins will be higher.
And there are some other very weighty considerations. Congress has made vaccine producers immune to lawsuits in many cases, so they have little to loose if they harm your child. The Philippine Supreme Court ruled that UNICEF sterilized 3 million women with contaminated vaccines which made them unable to sustain a pregnancy, and similarly in Africa.3 Recently, Baxter sent H1N1 vaccine contaminated with live bird flu virus to 18 countries. This could hardly have happened by accident as the factories are ISO 9000 compliant. Furthermore, it appears that the H1N1 virus is man-made, containing components of human, swine and bird flu each from a different continent. If so, harm was intended, and might not further harm be intended via the H1N1 vaccine? Something injected directly into your body has unlimited potential for mischief.
So, why would they do this? Huge profits for one, as the lifetime medical costs of an autistic person can be several million. But gasoline in your car does not decide your destination, likewise profits are only the driving force. By the theory of evolution, you and I are mere animals, though we are the most intelligent ones. If you had a field overgrazed by cows and nowhere to put the excess, you would kill some of them. Some powerful persons view the earth this way and are working diligently to reduce the earth’s population to around 2 billion or less. Vaccines, man-made diseases and degraded and toxic food are just some of the tools they are now using, so one must learn to protect himself.
If you find all this difficult to accept, don’t believe me, but rather look at the evidence and decide for yourself. Then take action to protect you and yours and warn others, as I am sure it will not be stopped. If the damage is already done, study how some parents have reversed autism by detoxifying their children. Some good websites dealing with the dangers of vaccines are: nvic.org, vactruth.com, childhoodshots.com, ageofautism.com, marytocco.com. Also investigate vitamin and nutritional God-given means for health protection. Good places to start are: mercola.com and naturalnews.com.
But ultimately true protection comes only from God: “For God so loved the world, that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish, but have eternal life.” John 3:16 “And it shall be, that whosoever shall call on the name of the Lord shall be saved.” Acts 2:21
- But be careful about much popular nutritional disinformation. You must study in some depth to get to the truth. [↩]
- I found in my own experience and others that vitamin C (a few grams for an adult) offers almost 100% protection from soreness after a vaccine, and I take that as strong evidence that it greatly reduces harm to one’s system. This would also suggest that undernourished children are at higher risk, just those in society least able to defend themselves. [↩]
- This is patented: bibliotecapleyades.net/salud/salud_vacunas29.htm (see Addendum #3) [↩]